Alt. Story

Katie Weise
Time Line of Music Video Game Releases
2005:
Guitar Hero
2006:
Guitar Hero 2
2007:
Guitar Hero 3, Rock Band, Guitar Hero Encore Rocks the 80s, Guitar Hero Carabiner, Guitar Hero 3 Mobile
2008:
Guitar Hero World Tour, Guitar Hero: Aero Smith, Guitar Hero: On Tour, Guitar Hero: On Tour: Decades, Guitar Hero 3 Backstage Pass, Guitar Hero World Tour Mobile, Rock Band 2, Rock Band Track Packs: Vol.1, ACDC Live, Vol.2
2009:
Guitar Hero 5, Guitar Hero: Metallica, Guitar Hero Smash Hits, Guitar Hero: Van Halen, Band Hero, DJ Hero, Guitar Hero on Tour: Modern Hits, Guitar Hero 5 Mobile, Guitar Hero Arcade, The Beatles: Rock Band, Rock Band Unplugged, Rock Band Mobile, Lego Rock Band, Rock Band Track Packs: Classic Rock, Country, Metal.

The Emerging Giant

21-year-old Eliza McArthur buying tickets for Kings of Leon through Live Nation Entertainment.


The Emerging Giant
By Blakeney Spong
ATHENS, Ga. - What do you get when you combine the nation’s largest ticketing company with the nation’s biggest concert promoter? Answer: a massive company that breaks into every facet of the music industry, not to mention a magnet for anti-trust legislation and a horde of consumer complaints.


In early February, Live Nation and Ticketmaster began negotiations for a merger between the two giants, which essentially has created one monster company called Live Nation Entertainment that combined their ticketing, marketing, data centers and back-offices, according to the Live Nation Entertainment press release.
“The companies will be combined in a tax-free, all-stock merger of equals with a combined enterprise of $2.5 billion…Live Nation and Ticketmaster shareholders will each own approximately 50 percent of the combined company,” the press release read.
The clear problem with this merger is the monopoly it has forced on the music industry and on concert-goers and music fans.
“It’s never a good thing when there’s a monopoly in any field. When there’s no competition, they can do whatever they want,” said Savannah Weeks, a 21-year-old Music Business student.
Ticketmaster was, by far, the most successful and well-known ticketing service in the country. Live Nation initially began as a company intent on providing consumers with an alternative, thereby generating competition in the market.
Live Nation seemed to be the company for the job, forcing Ticketmaster to perform at a higher level and prove itself to consumers. Live Nation quickly grew to be the nation’s largest concert promoter, an owner of dozens of amphitheaters (including the House of Blues) and has made over 360 deals with major artists like Madonna, Shakira and Jay-Z. In addition, Live Nation was in charge of 161 of the 200 tours in 2001, according to Billboard magazine.
However, Ticketmaster reestablished itself as the premiere ticketing service when it announced a plan to buy a majority of Front Line Management in October 2008. Front Line Management was one of the most powerful management companies in the world, according to Billboard magazine, and boasted touring acts such as the Eagles, Aerosmith, Fleetwood Mac, Jimmy Buffet and Christina Aguilera.
Though Ticketmaster seemed to be on top again, two major ticket debacles (one involving Ticketmaster, one with Live Nation) produced major disappointment by consumers in both companies and drove down shareholder investments. During Bruce Springsteen’s Working on a Dream tour, Ticketmaster re-routed fans to the company’s secondary site TicketsNow, which sells tickets at a premium price, even though regularly-priced tickets were still available. Live Nation experienced trouble when the Web site essentially crashed due to an overload of fans trying to buy tickets for the Phish reunion tour. Shortly thereafter, discussions of a merger between the two companies began to circulate.
Weeks isn’t the only one with these same concerns. Sen. Herb Kohl of Wash. commented on the merger after it was announced.
“What does Live Nation’s decision to merge with its competitor rather than fight in the market tell us about the company’s ability to compete with Ticketmaster? If Live Nation can’t compete, who can?” said the Senator.
Bruce Springsteen also expressed his opinion about the merger in a letter to fans on his Web site after the Ticketmaster disaster.
“The only thing that would make the current ticket situation even worse for the fan that it is now would be Ticketmaster and Live Nation coming up with a single system, thereby returning us to a near monopoly situation in music ticketing,” Springsteen wrote.
However, not all venues and artists have experienced such a massive effect as a result of the merger. Smaller venues in Athens like the Melting Point, 40 Watt and the Georgia Theater have not been affected in the same way venues like Philips Arena or Aaron’s Amphitheatre.
“Live Entertainment Nation controls everything, from promotions to ticket sales, by having this really intense monopoly that covers every aspect of a tour. As a small venue, we’re just on the same scope,” said Lexi Irvin, a 21-year-old Music Business student and intern at the Georgia Theater.
Irvin said that the merger doesn’t affect Athens as much because the city is home to so many small venues that can’t facilitate the huge concerts that Live Nation Entertainment is responsible for. Although these venues may book some national acts occasionally, for the most part, concert-goers are attending shows featuring local talent and buying tickets directly from these venues’ Web sites or in local record stores like School Kids Records.
Even with regard to the merger’s effect on national artists and big venues, not everyone has jumped on the bandwagon of disgust.
“I don’t think it’s a big deal. The two companies are good at what they do, and from a business standpoint, the merger makes sense,” said Dustin Barrett, a 21-year-old Finance major. “Merger or not, I wouldn’t have been buying tickets anywhere else. All I’m saying is for me, it didn’t change anything.”
Artists in favor of the merger include Seal, Eddie and Wolfgang Van Halen and Shakira (not a huge shocker considering her $70 million deal with Live Nation).
“Anything that can strengthen the link between music creators and music lovers has my support,” said Seal in a Rolling Stone interview, who has no stake in either company. “I believe the combined company will achieve that by aligning resources, talent and services.”
Live Nation Chief Executive Michael Rapino and Ticketmaster CEO Irving Azoff believe the merger “will help save jobs in the beleaguered music industry by forming a strong American company that can fend off foreign takeover threats,” according to an interview in Rolling Stone.
While this may be true, the central argument for opponents of the merger stand by the fact that concert-goers have no choice but to pay the prices and fees set forth by Live Nation Entertainment to see their favorite musicians. They have no legitimate alternative to turn to if they are unsatisfied with or overcharged by this ticketing conglomerate.
“I wanted to go to the Coldplay show this summer, but the tickets were $30, a $20 parking fee, a $13 convenience charge and there may have been another venue fee. I just couldn’t afford it,” said Weeks. “I feel like the real victim is unfortunately the music fan.”
For now the merger stands, but the outcome of anti-trust legislation has yet to be determined. However, you can bet the battle will be fierce.
“If nothing else, this controversy demonstrates another ailment of the music industry as the Internet and changing technology have taken over and transformed our daily lives,” said Haley Walker, a 21-year-old International Business major.

Edited by Thomas Patrick Hooper

Coldplay concert at Philips Arena in November 2008.

Spotify, Beacon for the Music Industry

By: Blakeney Spong
New music streaming Web site offers free access to millions of songs and play lists

ATHENS, Ga.-The new online “jukebox” Spotify may be the key to successfully putting the music industry at ease in this digital age. Already blazing a trail, Spotify is registering approximately 500,000 new users daily throughout Europe, according to Rolling Stone magazine.
Since the launch of iTunes in 2003, the online music mega-store has been responsible for 70 percent of all online music sales, including over 6 billion songs in its six years of operation. Despite the company’s success, it won’t be able to compete with the allure of a free product.
From Ruckus to Pandora, free music services have popped up all over the nation trying to bridge the gap between music consumers and the way they get their music, because not everyone wants to buy it (hence the trouble with piracy in the music industry). Plenty of people would rather stream music for free on their computers.
“Having music on my iPod or in my car is great, but what’s even better is having unlimited access to music that’s free,” said Lewis Brown, a Marketing major from Nashville, Tenn.
Spotify was founded in Stockholm in 2006 and launched in the UK in 2008. This online “radio station” provides a free 6 million track catalogue and as of March 2009, a clientele of over 1 million members.
Members who use Spotify can instantly access any song in the catalogue and create/share playlists with other users. Members using Spotify for free are subject to minimal amounts of advertising; however, a premium subscription is available. This level of membership costs around $14 per month and allows users full access to the catalogue ad-free, a higher sound quality, travel access and exclusive offers.
Another advantage of a premium membership is the ability to use Spotify on an iPhone. Apple recently approved a free application that allows premium users to search for new music and stream play lists from the Web site.
The partnership will be a huge asset to Spotify as far as giving consumers an incentive to buy a premium membership instead of using it for free. Although the benefits for Spotify may be easily understood, the motivations behind Apple’s support are a little unclear.
“Spotify has got so much buzz right now that it may be the next big thing, like Twitter and Facebook. It’s worked in Europe and now it’s coming over here and I’d be willing to bet that they [Apple] got a piece of it. They see the writing on the wall. They’re in the business of selling iPhones. iTunes is a big part of their revenue, but they sell iPhones,” said Bruce Burch, director of UGA’s Music Business Program.
In addition, Spotify now sells MP3 downloads as well as allowing users to just play songs. Currently, it links users to songs or albums from 7Digital (an online music store based in London), but Spotify is also negotiating with iTunes and Amazon.
In addition to creating headway for the music industry as an acceptable business model for the future, Spotify is also opening new roads on the promotion side of the music business by allowing unsigned artists to upload their music. With help from sites like http://www.dittomusic.com/ and Record Union, unknown artists can get their music directly to listeners on Spotify.
“I’ve talked to radio stations in Atlanta before and they won’t play your music unless your signed or on the top 50 on the charts. I would use it [Spotify] because any way to get your music out there when you’re unsigned is good because you need the publicity,” said Tanna Key, a 15-year-old aspiring musician from Rome, Ga.
Spotify is not yet available in the U.S because of licensing restrictions, but is expected to launch here at the beginning of next year and join several countries across Europe. According to Burch, these restrictions probably have to do with getting record labels on board.
“Getting a major record label to sign on is difficult because everybody wants to wait and make sure it’s going to work,” Burch said.
The hype about Spotify is generating a lot of interest in the U.S, especially with the recent display of support from Apple.
“It’s a really exciting time for the music industry. Anything could happen,” said Meredith McBee, a 21-year-old student senior in the Music Business Program. “Spotify’s proof of that.”

Edited by Jessica Cole